If they could prove that he did it then he would be in jail. What you ask is impossible from a common redditor.

That's the point.

He claimed "Trump raped a 13 year old with Jeffrey Epstein". He states it as if it's factual and known, when that is not the case. It is an unproven claim.

I'm not seeking to prove that he did not do it. I'm seeking to hold someone to their claims by asking them to validate what they're claiming. It's an exercise in accountability.

"I bet I can make an outlandish statement based on an unproven claim and pass it as fact."

Clearly not, and it seems to have pissed people off. Why?

As for the troll remarks, if you wanted to have a civil discussion then you wouldn't have started off by asking a loaded question.

You know what, that's totally fair.

They have given you some pretty good evidence and admitted that

We will likely never know the truth.

This is what I don't get. If you KNOW you don't know the truth, why do they insist on deciding what the truth is and presenting it as fact?

Why don't you chalk it up as a win in your books and call it a day instead of screaming bloody murder

Yes, I'm screaming bloody murder because people are passing unproven claims as facts. This must really inconvenience you.

I'm done, it's 7pm and the A-League is on right now.