I think it has a little to do with Trump himself. Trump is a vain person who, at one point, surrounded himself with as many “beautiful” women ( I beautiful in quotes because no woman who decides to be associated with that piece of shit is beautiful in my eyes; they are all fake people with crap personalities, half plastic from all the cosmetic surgery they have had) that having someone like SHS as the spokesperson for the White House kind of goes against what he has being doing his entire life - judging women on their looks.

If SHS didn’t want to be called ugly, then she shouldn’t have taken job from a man who calls women pigs.

Now to respond to idea that we should stoop to their level of childishness, I agree. It does nothing to the conversation along. That said, I don’t think criticizing her for her bad looks should confused with criticism of ugly people in general. Her appearance is magnified by the lies she says every time she opens her month. If she was telling the truth and people still resorted to calling her out for the pig she is, then calling her “oinkers” or that SHS literally baths in her own filth would be wrong. How ever, since she actively lies to the American people ever chance she gets, I say her looks and actions are fair game.

This is kind of stretch of a comparison but would condemn someone of made fun of Hitler’s mustache, Mussolini’s lack of hair, or Kim Jong-un’s micro-penis?