2) If somebody instigates a violent assault, and the defender happens to kill an innocent third-party as the result of a necessary self-defense, the assaulter should not be charged with felony manslaughter.

This is out and out bullshit. This innocent third party is litetally inextricably physically tied to the primary party. My logically consistent position is thus:

1) Pregnant women may not be held personally liable for a crime that would not exist if they themselves were not pregnant, because pregnant women are equal.

Explain to me how that clashes with your three rules you laughably consider as encapsulating all possible consistent logical thought