Manspreading on public transport is getting out of hand

I would say it is still different. In many countries breasts are not censored and/or covering isn't required (in certain places). There are few places outside of a straight up nude beach and R + rated films where taking out your penis isn't, frankly, illegal. Same goes for a woman naked from the waste down though, of course. So no, I would say they are definitely not equivalent.

Breasts are absolutely reproductive organs, though, as all aspects of reproduction don't just end after sex. The whole point is to create and nurish a baby and, you know, that's literally the sole purpose of breasts: feeding a child. Breasts are not sexual organs, but pleasure can be given and received by their stimulation. The same can be said for many other aspects of the body (e.g. neck, thigh, earlobe etc.); however, the main difference is that men have sexualized breasts over time and, as you mention, now consider them one of the most sexually appealing aspects of a woman. But consider male breast tissue/gynocomastia - they are the same exact thing as female breasts except without the reproductive aspect and sexualized nature. Male chests pretty much never have to by covered, regardless of breast tissue. I would consider this additional reasoning as to why breasts are not at all equivalent in this context.

/r/trashy Thread Parent Link - i.redd.it