if someone is attracted to porn of children/childlike characters, then it's not unlikely that they will also view real children as sexual.

Again, you make arguments that are purely emotional that's not based on reality. There's a reason why lolicon is not illegal or classified as CP, because it's literally just art and there's no link found between lolicon art and pedophilia. Any supposed link is purely just your belief and is anti science.

this obviously does not apply to furries because there is no such thing as a sentient anthropomorphic animal, it's purely fiction and remains so.

False, furries are fundamentally based on real life animals, anthropomorphized or not, and the same link could be made here. If one were to argue that both were ok, one could just as easily say that Loli is purely fantasy by pointing out that there exist no real life human that looks like an anime girl, an anime girl that could just as easily be a "1000 year old vampire" girl that just happens to be also be petite. Either they're both based on fantasy, or neither of them are. End of.

two people dressing up like cartoon dogs and goin' at it is weird, sure, but doesn't hurt anyone.

A dude jacking off to Loli, also fundamentally doesn't hurt anyone. To deny that is a slippery slope argument and not based on reality.

Nice try though, but doesn't look like your arguments have any substance, keep crying though. It's funny.