I'm not sure why you feel compelled to put private property at the center of all of your arguments. I think it's a mistake that is narrowing your view. What makes you think humans have a natural right to private property? This is certainly not something that is widely agreed upon, in the sense of land.

In the context of the United States, no shit, when someone enters your property without your permission, it's called "trespassing", and it's a crime. If they take something from your property, it's called "stealing", also a crime.

I'm not sure why you are erroneously conflating the right to water, for example, with the right to steal people's bottled water, for example. You're missing the point because it seems that you can't stop thinking about "private property".

Since you seem to be interested in philosophy, here is a hypothetical for you:

You own 10 acres of "private property" with a limitless well of pristine drinking water. A destitute family arrives at your property line and begs for water. You deny their request, and they perish of dehydration. Have you committed an atrocity and if so why?

To your last point, again, if you enter someone's property illegally to "give them a speech", you are trespassing (in the context of US law) and you are committing a crime. How in the actual fuck are you not understanding that this has nothing to do with "free speech" rights as granted by the US Constitution? Can someone stand at the edge of your property line and yell at you that you're a dumbfucc all day? Generally speaking, yes. Because in the US, you possess that right in any public space, within certain parameters that are held in consensus and in place to secure the peace and safety of the general public. This is not complicated stuff.

You should probably mix up your reading list a bit, because the shit ur on about is straight retarded.

Also, this is all rhetorical, I have no interest in educating you further. Keep reading. Good luck.