Thomas Parrott was a Black Library author who also spoke out against discrimination.

Is that really enough for some people to write this off as GW being unfair? Why won't you bring out his tweets in a way he wrote them and not how he wants us to perceive them? How there's a fascist (for him a fascist is someone for example advocating border control) element in the hobby and he want to find out what appeals to them and "cut it away with a knife" and that if it was up to him he'd castrate the "Space Marines in a literal sense" and add [REDACTED] Space Marines even by the means of retcon, in response to a tweet saying that Space Marines are a male fantasy or something akin to that, all with a "Black Library Writer" in his bio. Him now saying how he "considered SM eunuchs" is just him doubling down on the matter. I saw the tweets and it doesn't portray him as a "persecuted author who spoke discrimination" but rather someone who tired to use his position as an author to wage some kind of cursade against a "fascist" element in the hobby. Not to mention how he engaged in some heated discussion about how H.P Lovecraft was a racist a day after announcing some very private matter on twitter and pointing out how this is the "worst month of his life". It's clear his priorities are very skewered.