You think that apparently everyone there to witness the events that wasn't a Trump supporter was an extremist.

So, hyperbolic. I wasn't saying that every protester was an extremist, but that there are extremists amongst the protesters. And certain actions by the group gave those extremist the conformation they were looking for.

You choose to ignore an explanation because you don't like it, all while your argument is based on the lack any possible explanations.

I'm not sure how to parse this sentence, I ignore an explanation because I don't like it, and my argument lacks an argument? I made made several points, and explained why I made them.

You think Trump should be also directly responsible for anyone who kills a muslim, illegal immigrant, black, or anyone else with relation to the logic he's pander. Or at least you've pushed that logic.

To extent I believe, that if he or anyone goes out of his way to dehumanize a group of people baselessly uses a call to violence like "this is war" then, yes I believe that he is to an extent responsible. Calls to violence aren't justified.

But, it I never made the argument that Trump is directly responsible for all attacks, I said that it was possible that the violence came from within the protests. The words you put in my mouth were simply a gotcha point which I never made. People are responsible for their individual actions, but creating moral and popular incentive to act violently is in part the fault of those promoting that message.