not for nothing, but does that poster cite any sources?

I've got little doubt this police officer has crossed lines, but being that none of us were there and aren't privy to all of the information, it seems incredibly reckless that everyone is just piling on without looking for any factual data to back up the claims here.

Maybe it's all 100% accurate, maybe the dude is a turd sandwich, but I certainly am no going to condemn the guy based on 1 piece of propaganda which was made from a point of obvious bias. I mean cmon, using the dudes lawyer in the poster is just the dumbest thing possible. He needs representation, soooooo what is he supposed to do. Hire someone who has never been involved with a case like this, or maybe someone who has been involved and took nothing but L's?