i know why people disagree. it's because they don't quite understand what i'm saying. and i know that's a fact because they keep saying that i don't think someone killing someone is wrong because of the circumstances that led them there. it's fascinating though, this entire shit post after shit post is in itself a fantastic argument for why a moral system based on free will is so stupid

i have a bad argument style. it's basically this

1.) attack in a really vehement and vitriolic and kind of stupid way

2.) ignore or call the people who literally can't read stupid, lay out why they're stupid for misinterpreting or implying something i never said

3.) find the reasonable people and try to reason against the strongest positions (which, sadly hasn't really happened, it's either been people agreeing, people unable to accept choice as being more than just an individuals position, or really bad misreading of what i've said)

4.) regroup my thoughts if anyone had any good points, which people have, and learn from it

i tend to do these shitposts when im pretty suicidal which is just par for the course. plus i just got this new cheap mechanical keyboard and it's like having sex with my fingers, though i think im going to keep people up at night in this homeless shelter

anyways, if you really want a better understanding for all this, you'd have to read michael gazzaniga, steven pinker, dan dennett, peter hacker, john searle, there is a lot to is that i haven't explained, your basic srd goer isn't going to have the background and honestly i don't even know what that background might be. i guess a willingness to abandon free will?