well i cant disagree there. what really bugs me more than that though is the crazed focus on ad-hominem attacks instead of actually attacking the substance of what he's doing and offering alternatives. the public discourse is just "cheeto this" and "incompetent that." Both sides are guilty of this. Instead we could be hearing more of "well here is the plan for what we would like to try and get through, and here is how and why it is better than what the other guy is doing."

I would gladly listen to alternatives to Net Neutrality rules if there were any such proposal. But I think we both know that there is nobody offering any alternative paradigms beyond complete de-regulation of monopolies.