Edit: y'all, ignore no_regrats who is lying constantly about this issue and accusing me of shit. First they claimed Rose Knight didn't say the editorial was true. Except she did in her statement, which he linked to as "evidence" of my "lies". And in the editorial it said this was not a sexual assault issue. Now he's changed his argument to "she wrote the original editorial herself" which is not factual either. He's a typical lying conservative shill account and should be blocked.
I feel like I need to address this, since it concerns me directly.
First they claimed Rose Knight didn't say the editorial was true.
I never said that. You can check my posts on this thread to see this.
And in the editorial it said this was not a sexual assault issue
This is not true. You can find the full editorial yourself and see with your own eyes that the author of the editorial does not use the words "sexual assault". They don't say it's a sexual assault and they don't say it isn't.
Now he's changed his argument to "she wrote the original editorial herself" which is not factual either.
That is again not true. I did not change my argument. This is not even an argument. My exact words, as you can see by yourself on this thread were:
the publisher suspects she authored herself
Key word: suspects and the publisher. It's not my claim that she authored it, it is a speculation by the publisher. Here is the source on the publisher (bourne) suspecting that:
Bourne believes the editorial was written by the reporter herself. Both Bourne and Bell say they did not write the editorial and that it must have been one of the two reporters on staff. The second reporter, Paul Frey, told The National Post that he didn't know anything about it.
Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-grope-allegation-1.4730674
He's a typical lying conservative shill account
That is also untrue.