I was not involved in any of the underlying litigation that prompted the federal lawsuit I filed. So when you say they wouldn't rule in "my" favor, that's just not true. Is there something wrong with my 1983 claims by themselves? Cause you've said nothing about it. The RICO claim was a mistake, but it wasn't done in bad faith. So the only ethical violation I see there is a Rule 3.1 frivolous claim. It wasn't done intentionally though. Frivolous claims are subjective standards. The worst you can draw as far as lawyer sanctions (ABA Standards for Lawyer Sanctions, which my state uses as a guide) is a reprimand from an unintentionally frivolous claim. If they did that, I wouldn't have a problem. But no disciplinary analysis was conducted whatsoever.

To tell me that the content of my allegations are what's causing me to be disciplined is a patent first amendment violation. To tell me that I'm destroying characters and that's an ethical violation is to say absolute litigation privilege no longer applies in this state. Except that it does, and that's been affirmed since my suspension. So they just made an except to absolute litigation privilege for me only, and never published it.

What are the half dozen ethical rules you think I've broken?