My mother in law is driving me insane.

The source isn’t YouTube then is it.

If I said “XYZ” is true because YouTube video I’m an idiot. It doesn’t matter the context. Because YouTube is not a medium for research to be published and considered credible. If I say “XYZ is true because of this peer reviewed publication in this scientific journal, and you can find it’s abstract of discussion about it on YouTube” then It’s a valid proven point.

The backing of the YouTube video is the source and the proof.

Saying that some Youtube anthropologist says the pyramids were build by contractors is not credible (And not even saying a specific thing, just saying youtube) is absolutely low quality trash.

Someone asked for a source to a claim, and OP said “Every anthropologist on YouTube”.

/r/atheism Thread Parent