My Omega to AF TRP year.

Amen bro. OP's post was fucking great.

It makes me realize that TRP is sometimes like Alcoholics Anonymous. This post has the structure, feeling and tone of an AA qualification.

Like AA, we are a voluntary and distributed group of people who communicate with one another in order to improve our lives and change our behavior. Like AA, we all agree that certain behavior patterns are not effective and lead only to misery. AA members strive to be free of "Alcoholism," while Red Pill members strive to be free of "Beta Behavior."

Both of these behavior patterns (alcoholism and beta behavior) are real phenomena that DO exist in the real world, but they are also incredibly hard to define with 100% accuracy. Scientists scoff at AA because no one has a concrete definition of "Alcoholism," just like /r/thebluepill scoffs at TRP because we have no perfect definitions of "Betas" and "Alphas."

Yet these behavior patterns undoubtedly exist. Alcoholics exist. Beta Males exist. Alcoholics can go to AA to get better... But where can Beta Males go?

Many AA members say that when they joined AA, they finally had a name for the behavior patterns they didn't like: "Alcoholism." Just by having a NAME for their unwanted behaviors, they could suddenly understand that these behaviors were not innate. (No one comes out of the womb while drinking a handle of whiskey. We had to LEARN that behavior. But unless we have a name for that behavior, we can't externalize it and understand it.)

Just like Alcoholics don't self-identify as Alcoholics until they learn that "Alcoholism" exists, Beta Males do not self-identify as Beta. They don't even KNOW they are Beta, because they don't know what "Beta" IS.

I believe that TRP could benefit if we got together and formulated easily-comprehensible, one-sentence definitions of "Alpha Behavior" and "Beta Behavior." These definitions would not have to be perfect, but as long as they are easy to understand and easy to communicate, we could potentially help a lot of men.

It could be something simple like: "Beta behavior is placing yourself below another person. Alpha behavior is placing yourself above another person."

I have found that life is pretty simple, and definitions like these could go a long way towards articulating a generalized theory of human behavior, both sexual behavior and social behavior. Life seems to operate based on a few simple rules, like these:

If you place yourself below a fellow man, they will like you. If you place yourself above a fellow man, they will *not like you unless they can benefit from associating with you.*

If you place yourself below a woman, they will like you in a platonic way and NEVER in a sexual way. If you place yourself above a woman, they will be sexually attracted to you.

It seems like life usually operates by this very simple set of rules. I'm sure there are many exceptions to each rule, but in my experience these rules apply to at least 95% of all interactions I've ever had.

Could we codify our beliefs in a succinct manner like this? I think it would help people understand what we do here. If we had simple, accurate definitions of "Beta Behavior," "Alpha Behavior," and a few principles of human interaction that we extrapolated from our definitions, we could potentially greatly expand our ideological reach.

Alcoholics can go to AA to get better... But where can Beta Males go? They can come here. But first they need to know what a Beta is. I think it is our responsibility to define it.

/r/TheRedPill Thread Parent