People aren't even reading my points about what makes the first film great and reasoning with me that the fourth doesn't have those. The argument that I saw it when I was young and have nostalgia for it argument doesn't hold up because I can enjoy and movie and objectively tell you if it's not a great film in comparison to other films even with nostalgia. If I had seen Jurassic World when I was 5 and grew up with nostalgia for it then watched again over time until I was old enough to properly critique it, I would probably still come to the realization that it's more of a popcorn flick with dinosaurs and less of a film about some of the ethical dilemma we have with modern science. Name one super important scene where the dialogue just sucks you right in in Jurassic World...there just weren't really any. All being said, like I said before, I enjoyed the film, I appreciate what it's done is is continuing to do to push the franchise to live on. I'm betting this next film is going to be one of the best films of the s series just like I'm anticipating The Last Jedi to be this generation's Empire Strikes Back. Whether you enjoyed it or not, you'd be lying to yourself if you thought Jurassic World was as good of a film as it could have been if done with the same care as Jurassic Park. Like, I'm just so surprised people in this subreddit are this sensitive. Like, if you don't agree with my points in the second comment in the picture, then you clearly like the first film for the dinosaurs and not the deeper meaning behind the ethics behind having power that maybe shouldn't be utilized. If you watch the first film, right after they see the raptor paddock they're in the conference where Goldblum makes his most famous monologue about chaos theory. If you watch JP and that scene isn't the single most important scene in the movie for you, then you don't understand the film. Period.