Validating the comically unjust land distribution of tyrant bloodthirsty czars is a very strange thing to do in the 21st century. this argument is can be basically defined as “pro-serfdom”.

You can’t transplant modern neoliberal “freedom of property ownership” beliefs into a literal feudal state, that’s incredibly ahistorical and incorrect. Small numbers of rich folks owning 90% of arable land would be considered unjust and immoral today. To defend the property ownership of the kulaks (and to use modern capitalist language to do it too) puts you somewhere between a monarchist and a fascist, which is why i am so quick to decry such nonsense.