New DeFranco Video: SJW Laci Green Goes After Small Youtuber Over Copyright! Want to pick on someone your own size?

"You are so witty and clever..."

Yeah yeah, I know. Meanwhile, you're the opposite.

"You are a delusional fuck that I enjoy toying with and laughing at your absurd conclusions."

Right... No, sure you do! What conclusions? Absurd how? And how exactly does you getting overly-emotional and angry and expressing a wish to fight me, and you feeling failed and desperate enough to brag about your (likely fictitious) family to a stranger, and you losing every single argument we've had, constitute you "toying" with me? I mean... what? On which planet? Lmao, I mean... ok then. But you honestly seem to be riling yourself up, not me.

"You actually think I was 'forced into surrender'..."

No, I know you were because fact is... you were.

"You can defeat someone without them surrendering..."

Yeah, no shit. I've done that to you in addition to accepting your white flags, dipshit. You've legit thrown fits and said you were leaving and abandoned arguments (aka, surrendered) after I forced you into corners that you could never get out of because I simply asked you questions, like for proof of your bs claims, or pointed out facts, or asked you to be rational and logical and empathetic, multiple times now.

"I love how you keep thinking you won this argument..."

This? I won all of our arguments. I don't simply think that, I know that 'cause it's, you know, a fact.

"You haven't proven anything."

No, I have. The one with the 100%-failure-to-prove-his-argument stat is you. The one with the 100%-winning stat is me. See here:

*"I actually like her and think she has many valid points but MANY times she makes association that are just not there."

Like when? 10 bucks says your next post further proves your lack of intelligence and reasoning skills. The irony is that it is you who is both dumb and a little bitch. You're unable to backup any of your claims because you are wrong and now doing a pathetic little face-save last-word dance. Cute.*

And here: *"Back to my points, Laci does make many good points and calls out legit instances of anti-equality BS, HOWEVER she also tries to make connections that are just not there to play the victim."

You imply that this is something she does habitually but do you have more than one example of her doing this? Also, when I asked another user for examples of Laci making everything she talks about a battle, you responded, "How about every possible thing that could even remotely be construed as a male vs female thing when most of the time it literally has nothing to do with gender?"

But can you actually list multiple instances of Laci turning issues into a male vs female battle? During the twitter argument about Amtrak (your only example and a bad one at that) Phil is actually the one who did that. You made that emotional and moronic bullshit claim but couldn't even list one real example not to talk of the several it would take to validate your claim of "every possible thing."*

And here: *"HOWEVER she also tries to make connections that are just not there to play the victim. The train thing was a perfect example."

Is it? Her asking Amtrak why her vids aren't viewable on their trains is a perfect example of her habit of making connections that are not there to play victim? At the risk of giving your questionably-developed brain a headache, this is where I'm going to need you to try something called 'thinking critically.' Let's examine what actually happened and keep our feelings out of it. Laci tweeted Amtrak a question after observing a real problem. How exactly is Laci tweeting Amtrak her question, after making her legitimate observation, an example of her making a connection that is not there? What connection did she make in her tweets that wasn't actually there? Her observations were not imagined but totally true. What horrible or divisive or cruel thing did she tweet that day to Phil about the subject? Please quote it if it exists as I may have missed it.

If Phil found out, while trying to upload a YT video on an Amtrak train, that he couldn't because his YT vids and channel were blocked, then tweeted "Yo, @Amtrak, is there a reason my YT channel is blocked on your trains? That's some crazy censorship BS" do you honestly imagine you'd think Phil was wrong for tweeting that? I wouldn't think he was wrong.*

And here: *"It was NOT against her personally but she made it as if it was a direct attack on her."

How did she do that? You really are very emotional and dumb. All she did was state facts. At what point did she claim the block was a personal attack? Right, she didn't. She reported her factual observations to argue that it couldn't be about bandwidth because she'd watched several other YT videos with no issues. *

And here: *"She fucking claimed a video for using her image when the video is fucking about her...."

Have you actually watched the video, dumbass? It's not about her at all. As I said before, it's a gray area worth Laci's inquiry and claim-filing. Even Phil admitted its grayness to be sorted out between lawyers. The girl presents her video like Laci is a main feature (she's not) or like it's Laci's video and that totally contributed to the clicks and attention it got.*

And here: *"Lol. I can type up to 60 wpm on a keyboard..."

Yet you whined about how long it takes you type on your phone? Right... Of course you can, dear. And I'm sure you're also the strongest boy in your WHOLE school, and the richest and most handsome one too!

"...oh and if you had half a brain you would know that exponentially could be to the first which would be the same value, you fucking moron."

Wow. Your stupidity really is boundless. You weren't talking about math but simply claiming that writing on your phone takes a lot longer than writing on your desktop. Then I pointed out that it only takes a lot longer (so is the comparative "waste of time" you claimed) for slow people, not everyone. I mean context is everything and you literally wrote "Typing on your phone takes exponentially longer than on a desktop..." using "exponentially" for comparison as a synonym for 'a lot longer;' nothing to do with math. I mean... it's like you're trying to make sure anyone who reads this knows exactly how stupid you are at this point. "Fucking moron" is clearly you addressing yourself as I've said 0 unintelligent things and I can literally quote you saying several. A fucking moron you are indeed.

"Lol. Btw, if you think 60 wpm is good at typing you are either 50+ years old and shitty with computers or sub 20 because that is not even impressive."

I mean, you were the idiot bragging about it so I assumed you were doing so because you felt it was good. You were bragging about being average? I guess that's fitting for a moron actually.*

And here: *"My replies literally take me sub 1 min to write on my phone because you are not worth more time."

Plenty of your posts have been long. You've even come back to make a second post before the first one was ever read several times now. Lol, you literally said that to post on your phone takes "exponentially longer" than posting on your desktop, then admitted to only being able to type 60 wpm. But sure, bitch boy, whatever you say.*

And here: *"I don't need to lie about who I am. You on the other hand feel like such a victim that you blame everyone else for your pathetic state. Learn to deal with reality and make it work for you. Trying to make every little grievance into a huge issue just makes the actual large issues get lost in the shuffle.

TL;DR: Quit being a little bitch and man up."

Not sure what any of that was about as I haven't blamed anyone for anything or at any point considered myself...*

Then more here: *"Tl;dr"

Lol, what was the point of this? You clearly did read it as you responded to things I said in it. Not to mention, your response is actually about as long as mine was, dumbass.*

And more here: *"Why would you put a TL;DR AFTER everything. only idiots do that."

??? Lmao, tf? You yourself put one at the end of a post, retard. You do that because that is the standard way it's done, dumbfuck. People who aren't morons like you know to scan long posts in search of the "TL;DR" if there is one. When it's in front of the post it just comes off as being used in the more popular way it's used - as a response where you're telling someone that their post was "TL" so you "DR."

"It is called a BLUF statement, bottom line up front."

BLUF statements speak for themselves, dipshit. You don't add "tl;dr" to them. Adding "tl;dr" makes it a 'tl;dr statement,' you idiot. "TL;DR" statements are supposed to be brief but your unbelievably stupid self didn't separate the "TL;DR" part from the rest of your post. This is your new stupidity low. And here I thought you couldn't get any dumber.*

/r/DeFranco Thread Parent Link - youtu.be