Cool that's you I don't really have the willpower or energy to do so in a way in which I can function.

I am not you and my needs may be different.

So quite literally unless you find a way in which the other agent can be considered on the same ethical footing we do have to draw a line. Cuz I'm okay with eating bugs too. How about milking cows do we just let all of them starve? Are fish the only thing that is okay? Plants have reactive properties and can respond to direct impact and even spread signals to other plants nearby as warning which is all basically the symptomology of pain, and the expressing of suffering to others should we extend moral consideration to them they may be cognizant depending on the plant just operating on different time scales than you understand?

How about the rocks? Should we consider moral implications to the rocks? Do you murder a rock when you move it? If you take a rock and shape it into a different shape via chisel and Hammer does that destroy it? Should you morally consider your consumption of your rock?

With it as Co equal as an ethical agent?

With inconsideration of ethics which is about the social structure of living organisms? Because it's created by a group of living organisms that can self think and self-describe concepts. Mean yeah we're a bunch of Chinese boxes walking around making up labels about all of the things in the world but there must be a line of where ethical consideration begins and ends in consideration to agent and non-agent.

Without such constraints you are not actually engaging in ethics.

You're literally making an argument about how everyone should act away because you feel real bad. And some animals feel real bad at some points in their lives. And instead of directly trying to impact reducing the suffering that we can while increasing the possible well-being which does in fact mean some form of "production" although not the capitalistic framing of consumerist speculative production. Yeah everybody should be waiting way way more plant and way less meat. and even I the moment I have an understanding that a creature is within very fundamentally close proximity to showing signs of deserving ethical consideration I have trouble considering eating it.

Such as a pig who have been shown to be able to use computers and lab tests with intent which makes it hard for me to feel okay justifying pork. And I actually do make efforts to cut it from my diet although admittedly I forget every once in a while because I'm bad at it. Bad at building habits.