To clarify, I don't like broad statements about any gender without evidence. To say that abrasive men will legit go out and rape women if they can't get a fwb sounds like a false statement to attribute to all of these men. It's like men who rape women may be abrasive and unable to find sexual partners but that doesn't mean that all abrasive men who cannot find a sexual partner are going to rape women. That may sound too technical to you and you may want to settle on the emotional argument and maybe for reddit that's fine, but for important decisions like policy, laws and for considering social impacts, it's best to be more nuanced and analytical.

Source? I do a decision making job for my government and therefore have to consider the weight of evidence and caselaw before I make decisions that impact lives.