Not getting robbed today

You can argue he had a gun it is reasonable to assume he could have another. This is reddit and everyone here is from different countries and the law applies differently but here it is where I live

Self-defence against unprovoked assault 34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force they use is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself. Extent of justification (2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if

(a) they cause it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and (b) they believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm.

Even in the USA I would love to see a case where someone who was unarmed got charged for defending himself against someone armed with a gun. Even looking at the video play it in slow motion he is still twitching before each kick. The defense would argue he still has cause to be fearful.

/r/fightporn Thread Parent Link - v.redd.it