I'm honestly not triggered but of course that is exactly what a triggered person would say lol. But seriously if you think I am that is fair but there probably is not much point continuing. From your perspective I wouldn't think it is worth it to talk to someone who is going on about a subject because they are personally offended. It will just be emotional ramblings.

But if you think I might not be, then this is my response to the rest of your comment: Firstly, I use the phrase proven wrong in a casual way. And I'm open to that being called the wrong way lol. But the same way I can't prove ancient people's myths wrong... they are basically wrong. So in that sense, Marx is completely off the marks...all of 'em. And today, philosophically it is pretty ridiculous. Sources? Well fair enough. I'll recommend a general source so you can see it "disproven" under a number of different areas but it is like asking "why is Marx's theory of value wrong?" I mean like...lol? We can see that blatantly with the general criticisms (art, old wines etc) and their feeble defenses.

But sure, check out Section 8 of Karl Marx in Routledge philosophy encyclopedia along with the entry on dialectical materialism (I know that term was used in the "Russian enlightenment" so to speak but the entry covers the flaws in the Marxist view even though that is not Marx's term... it is in the context). The whole section on marx points out the flaws in his thinking.