Nice try, but you're entirely wrong. My argument is that the site altogether does hurt their brand, and it takes their public stance to a whole other level. Their public stance is satirized once, at the top of the page. The rest of it is baseless parody of bigotry that doesn't exist.

Plus, here's something interesting to note: you brought up fair use first, claiming that the website would pass the fair use test. Fair use only applies to copyright, you ignoramus. There is no other fair use test out there, but please, keep making things up to suit your nonexistent point. Even if you're referring to the privileges and defenses of defamation, nothing on the website would support a fair comment nor a fair report privilege. And then you devolved to name-calling to support your argument, as though you believe I support Memories Pizza's views. There's a fine line between tolerating discrimination, and being against a blatant attack on one's character and business, although that line seems to be much like your arguments: nonexistent.

Derp Derp I'm downbeataura and I think protecting bigots is more important that discrimination and free speech

Very mature. I can see that furthering this debate would be a waste of my time, as you can't seem to get through your thick skull that the first amendment doesn't mean anyone can do whatever they want.

Until then, I'll leave you with this simple guide to defamation and its requirements. Hopefully, the next time we meet, you'll be more mature, and will actually understand what you're trying to argue. Nice debating you, thanks for the semi-intellectual conversation, and goodbye.