SJWs are the current face of liberalism, the same way the religious right was the face of conservatives for a while. No one on those subs is stupid enough to think "all liberals are SJWs", but while the current left wing talking points and social activities are more SJW than not, they will be what people consider liberal. It's the same problem the right wing has had for nearly 2 decades now, the crazies have become the face of that wing.

I'm a lefty myself, as are most of the anti-SJWs I know. We understand that the term liberal is becoming attached to the SJWs, the same way conservatives got attached to the Anti-gay lobbies. That's how media works now and how memes grow.

My problem with your post is the language you use. Look at it like "Trigger warnings", they're a fucking stupid concept that acts over the top paranoid about BAD FEELINGS. Where as not a single sane person on the planet objects to "content warnings". Everyone understands an age rating and a rough idea of the films content makes an informed consumer, so is better for everyone. They are in effect the same thing labeled 2 different things, which makes them become two different things in people's minds. When you use the language of the SJWs, you come across as a SJW even if you aren't. When you start using right-winger as some kind of insult, as if it's stupid to even hold right wing opinions, you're doing "the enemies" work, by discrediting valid ideas and opinions because they're not your own. Which is why you sound like you're on "the enemies" side, instead of "our side". "Our side" doesn't consider right winger to be a bad thing and thinks that both right and left have things to offer, where as the SJWs are so radical left they can't tolerant right wing people even existing. Which is why you come across like SRS when you use it as a negative term.