“sure as hell”....this coming from someone who was honestly considering choosing the PARODY option. hmmmmm....okay. passage 2 included ideas about private property that were not expressed in passage 1, so it wasn’t a “concise description”— that would mean both of them were saying the same exact thing, but that in passage 1 he was being circuitous. passage 1 expressed the idea of how greed was at the root of mankind’s problems, supplemented it in the middle with the whole private property thing, and then at the end returned to the concept of immorality. passage 2 was entirely about private property—it expounded more (an extension) on it than did passage 1.