On Ignosticism and Agnosticism

An ignostic on the other hand has enough knowledge on something that he can conclude they are inconherent, contradictory, and inconsistent

Wrong.

Ignostic does not have to claim that "God" hismelf is "inconherent, contradictory, and inconsistent." What does it even mean for "God to be inconsistent?" You are a really straw-manning Ignosticism here.

Instead, Ignostic claims that DEFINITIONS of God that were provided so far are "inconherent, contradictory, and inconsistent."

Since the DEFINITIONS of God that were provided so far are "inconherent, contradictory, and inconsistent." - the only conclusion is that there really is not really a definition at all.

Which leads straight to agnosticism.

/r/DebateAnAtheist Thread Parent