okay so basically I don't really mind forcefully removing people from their "land" if it means that we'd gain extra territory

y'know there's an ancient Chinese saying that goes something like this "if someone has the ability to rule then they should rule" (I don't remember the exact quote) but if we apply that to what the US did then it was absolutely justified, America had the ability to expand westward so the real question here is why not? why leave all that land to the Natives when we could easily take everything?

I also hold the belief that if a country (or in this case a tribe) is unable to defend their territory then whoever ends up conquering them becomes the new rightful owner of all the newly acquired land (which is why I want the US to annex the entirety of North America)