Man, this is far outside my concentration. No, I haven’t done any case studies on prejudicial imagery in firearms. And I’m not about to do for you. It is a very specific question.

In our current media climate, there is no reason it could be good.

What if he takes a bad shot? What if OP is in the wrong? What if the adrenaline in his system mare him jumpy? His sentencing could be much worse if the jury believes prejudice influenced his decision to use the weapon.

I’m calling bullshit on your legal friends, no offense. That or you must live in an extremely red area. I cannot see how a lawyer worth his salt would think this is a good idea. I imagine your friends said something along the lines of “there is no law against it” and your interpreted that as “go ahead”

You know what, go ahead.

Put a rebel flag on your holster for all I care.