When it comes to firearms "quality" is what works 99% of the time without having to dick with it. It's unecessary to introduce extra steps, you gain nothing. Now multiply that for every issued rifle in the army. It's a logistics nightmare to introduce such practices in the military structure.

Listen, I'm going to train this year with LFT and Dan Brokos has much more time behind a supressed rifle than anyone of us. If he runs it and calls it good, if the military itself runs it....calls it good. I don't think you can hold a candle to that. Just say it's not your preference. But trying to be edgy and call it trash just because don't like it screams insecure basement dweller