You've been talking about bad leadership of IK and now you are assuming about his actions in the future and again being accusatory. PTI does see SC as being somewhat malicious. I mean everyone can see it, they kept talking procedures and they kept giving everybody the run around and now all of the sudden all the procedures and all the issues they were having has become irrelevant for them Now that NS was going to be in some serious trouble. We have IK stating on camera that if we agree to anything whether we consider the actors to biased or not, we will accept their decisions because we accepted the conditions with them. THis is what was done previously with the whole election dhandli debacle as well. PTI accepted the new results and they accept the decisions that were clearly not in their favor.
And what is the point of doing such an exercise?
You protest for accountability. And later accept a court whom you yourself accept as biased? why?
If you accept the SC as malicious, its obvious to see you aren't going to get any justice.
You create instability, and empower the military, and in the end do something that is outright absurd - which is to accept the SC as a fair arbitrator after you have accepted it to be malicious.
More importantly, how is anyone supposed to satisfy a man who does not have faith in even the highest judiciary of the country?
What you are saying is simply absurd.
This is absolutely a silly concern. The duration can simply be related to when someone was 1st in public office. This doesn't tie down any one person's career to another and holds people accountable when they were supposed to be representing the public trust. Thats what this has been about.
But that's not what the PTI's TORs say. Had the PTI's TORs said that my argument would be invalid.
Absolutely, NS is the leader and I'm sure you know how leadership and accoutability works. The leader is the responsible party. They are the accountable party. The leader gets free passes on a lot of things like holding up businesses and hijacking their containers with goods and causing them monetary loss. I have no idea why you are ignoring that the leader's accountability is a must. Its the leader who can then hold those under him accountable. This is basic reasoning.
The leader should be held accountable.
I don't argue against that. I'm saying the TOR's should reflect impartiality or we need separate TOR's for those who are in public office and for those who are not.
That is all.
Another reason that comes out of nowhere. You believe he is much much worse the NS but you are willing to support some one who you think is absolutely evil if he is the PM. Bro....... -__-
I would have supported IK if he was a PM opposing policies, which are destroying the country from within. And a foreign policy is a large part of it.
NS should have understood this and should have acted with reason. It isn't so hard to not rob the nation.
bhai, why dont you understand, IK is merely a pawn used by the military to pressurize the government.
Its a different reason every time. It was the election rigging then, now its the panama leaks it will be something else in the future.
Lets look at the past; edhi acused him of trying to topple the government before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOyLrVyZHJY
IK admitting that he wanted to create a 'pressue group': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crwWVURqds
Now you may want to give IK the benefit of doubt here. So lets see:
Ex-president of PTI accused him of similar charges:
https://www.thenewstribe.com/2015/07/24/army-officers-used-imran-khan-for-their-interests-javed-hashmi/
PMLN says the same: http://tribune.com.pk/story/291120/pml-n-warns-army-isi-to-stop-supporting-pti/
IK has ties with Gen Hamid Gul - a known taliban sympathize: http://herald.dawn.com/news/1153577/whos-afraid-of-imran-khan
Hamid Gul's son even hangs out with the likes of Hafiz saeed and the rest
Then