This is perhaps a stunning example of BJP’s contradictory political behaviour: the party that disrupted the Parliament the most in the last five decades crying foul that the Opposition is not allowing the house to work.
The Congress and the Opposition want Lalitgate accused Sushma Swaraj to go without a discussion or preconditions just as the way the BJP wanted many of the UPA ministers to resign while it was in opposition during the last decade.
In February 2014 (during UPA II), the same Swaraj again justified her party's relentless acrimony in the Parliament.
The 15th Lok Sabha, with UPA II government, was the crowning glory of the BJP in disruption of the Parliament - at 61 percent, its productive time was the worst in Indian legislative history.
The Congress can quote to BJP Arun Jaitelys justification of the pandemonium in Parliament during UPA II: If parliamentary accountability is subverted and a debate is intended to be used merely to put a lid on parliamentary accountability, it is then a legitimate tactic for the Opposition to expose the government through parliamentary instruments available at its command.
Here are some relevant news items:credits to u-sr33
I'm a bot | OP can reply with "delete" to remove | Message Creator | Source | See how you can help! Visit the source and check out the Readme