Calling me combative as motive to 'skirt the issue' is not "Giving you the benefit of the doubt"

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is where an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]

Notice the "attacking the character, motive" part?

Is it really that difficult?

You could have countered the points I made, but you chose not to, even now.
Calling someone's motive for providing you with a logical counter point is a personal attack.

There is no if's or but's here.

You failed to attack the argument. You continue to attack me even now by copy/pasting your attacks in multiple places even when asked to start providing evidence to support your view.

I can only conclude that your position is "You're wrong because I said so!"