He said that it was not established the comments made by the judge undermined faith in the judiciary system. However, this was established by an impartial body and recently reaffirmed in Alberta when it was decided his apologies and rehabilitation mean that he can practice as a lawyer again. The judge has stated that his actions were innapropriate, apologized for them, and will now practice as a lawyer in an ethical way. The judge does not consider what happened to be an SJW witch hunt or vigilanate justice.

All accused should be considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This is true in the case of Peter Bowal and the judge he commented on. I'm not going to assume something specific happened until it's established by an impartial investigation and neither should you.