This really just seems like the standard Reddit intellectually lazy false equivalence approach to political analysis. It seems like you're kind of fixated on identity politics, I'm not so concerned with that.

Well you're the one who brought it all up. All I did was criticize sensationalist headlines that amounts to little more than "DAE climate deniers are murderers???"

false equivalence

You keep using that word. You're really going to need to point out where I made a false equivalence. If anything, you made it by immediately equivocating my criticism of sensationalist media with a support of Fox reporting methods.

Calling for less sensationalist media =/= More Fox.

In fact, you've veered so far off topic that you were the first one to mention Fox, industry sponsorship and now corporations.

Calling for less sensationalist media on all sides =/= More industry & corporate sponsored media. If anything, corporate media is promoting sensationalist media.

Climate change is a possible existential threat to human civilization.

Do you kinda sorta see how a denier might focus on that specific word in order to downplay the hype while a supporter views it as a motivator?

In fact Fox has been repeatedly shown to outright lie. You can't say the same for what you view as the "liberal media", which I would call the somewhat more centrist but still pro-corporate media eg CNN.

Allow me to consult my Confirmation Bias Engine.