Now hold on a second, all I was saying is how Crawford showed how he has the potential to be a ATG and that others as well whose careers are far from over. When did this become a Mayweather vs Pacquiao argument? Some of you Pacquaio fans are ridiculous, can't say the name Mayweather without somebody having to chime in and write a few paragraphs about their savior.

And the first thing you mention is Pacquiao beating Hatton. You do realize that Mayweather fought Hatton in his prime, undefeated and knocked him out two years before Pacquiao fought him right? You do realize that Mayweather has the better résumé by far and didn't fight C level fighters like Clottley, Rios, Algeri, Vargas, and Horn? He also didn't have to fight the same guys 3-4 times because he either lost or didn't beat them convincingly and I don't remember Mayweather getting knocked out by his rival or losing to a school teacher. But I'm sure you remember how Pacquiao was embarrassed by Mayweather, or his piss poor performance against Horn, or beating up washed up opponents who Mayweather beat first, like Mosley and De La Hoya.

Let me ask you a question, when was the last time Pacquiao fought someone significant, and won, besides Bradley (who he beat 3 times for no fucking reason)? You might have to skip past Horn (lost), Algeri, Vargas, Rios, Marquez (got knocked out), Mosley (old and washed up), Margarito (old and washed up), Clottley, and go all the way back to Cotto in 2009, someone Mayweather also beat at a more impressive 154 (which is 24lbs higher than what he stated boxing at).