No, I'm relatively certain that women have depended upon the labor of men to sustain them for centuries, a labor which is enabled by the same chemical that causes male aggression and sexual dimorphism. Still today, at the height of feminist egalitarianism, women refuse to perform manual labor jobs like mining, manufacturing, foundry work, and construction. It is not that they wouldn't be able to do this work so much as they would prefer not to and that men are more able to do it due to larger physical capacity.

The reality is that women are far less frequently victimized by men than men victimize one another. Additionally, your analogy is prima facie inane as quite apparently there are two sexes required for reproduction.

About 60% of intimate partner murders are committed by men, and 40% of intimate partner murders are committed by women. Outside of that, the vast majority of violent killings and assaults: for drugs, robbery, gang violence, etc are pure male on male violence. When it comes to "romance," men are only slightly more likely to kill or commit domestic violence.

Male on female rape is more likely - but these statistics have been vastly inflated by the feminism industry in order to create what is now almost a 200 billion dollar per year industry of women's services paid wholly by the government. According to the FBI 4% of women will be raped in their lifetime with a "force component" - this is, of course, far too high, but lower than what is declared by feminists.

A force component, according to the FBI consists of one or more of the following: 1. violence, 2. restraint, 3. threats of harm or violence, 4. forced or stealth drugging of the victim.

Feminists claim 25% of women are raped in their lifetimes. If only 4% of these are "force" then the 21% must be "unforced" - which means that these women were free to leave at any time which, as a forced rape victim myself, I will never consider to be rape (unless it's a minor, so I assume some portion of that number is statutory and/or child abuse).