Given people can just use A.I. and not say so, and at least some of the time your not gonna be able to tell for sure (Obvious examples of the above aside, those will exist too). Is this really gonna do anything except threaten a lot of innocent people who get labeled as "This answer is bad, it must be A.I.".

I know that isn't the intention but I feel like a sub like this completely banning A.I. Content is pointless for a variety of reasons. Like first off, doesn't all the "Bad faith/bad A.I." content just equate to stuff that is already against the rules to post?" And as I said, your just as likely to start it hitting innocent people who get accused of using AI when they didn't.

I know that doesn't matter, Mods have made there call. But honestly? This is too me like "We are banning anyone who uses google to help make the point they wrote." It's akin to banning people for using bad articles, for finding some random crap list to answer a "Give me books like X" on some other website, or finding a "the onion' article and quoting it verbatim.

I'm not even saying the A.I. stuff is not an issue in many ways, it is. But this is gonna be so subjective (and honestly as I said feels pointless to call out specifically) it feels like a "Rules based on how we feel not logic". People are mad A.I. is starting to threaten the livelihood of authors, so a lot of people are banning A.I. in a knee-jerk "This is how we can help fight for the cause!".