They're all regurgitating innuendo from the WaPo article.

Yes, it's been established that you don't understand how to distinguish between original reporting and reporting what another outlet already sad.

And there's no direct quotes from anyone with specific or direct knowledge.

Again, confirming you just don't understand how to read reporting.

The source attribution isn't specific, so you have no way of knowing whether it is a DOJ source or a source within the prosecutor's office. It likely is.

Otherwise- you would quote it directly

Somehow I doubt you took issue with the prior reporting on the Gaetz investigation that didn't use quotes and specific attribution because it fed into what you want to believe.

I would like for Gaetz to have been charged, but unlike you I'm not living in a fantasyland by denying any reporting that doesn't allow me to believe that.