Hey, an actual source this time! Nice

maybe you didnt bother reading the original thread because i just clicked both links and OP literally used the same link..so you say "oh an actual link this time" proves you either didnt read it the first time, or are lying now.

See this is just nonsense. The indolent cancefs aren't extraneous...they're the overwhelming majority of cases, and a not-insignificant number of deaths

EXACTLY what makes them 'extraneous', because the indolent cases are the majority of cases, they make the mortality rate relatively low, because the total prevalence of prostate cancer is so high, the number of serious cases is enough to make it the second biggest cancer killer of men...you're being confused by how percents work here.

Look, you wanted to break out just advanced prostate cancer over and over. You not liking yhe result doesn't make it irrelevant.

but the point is advanced prostate cancer stands alone as the second biggest cancer killer of men. that there also happen to be a great number of indolent cases that average down the mortality rate isn't really relevant to the more serious cases.

So were talking about advanced disease, which yes, does actually make up ~10% or less of new cases. Hmmm, after wiping off your bullshit it actually looks like there's nothing left. No contradiction, no point proving, just dishonesty and bad faith.

but saying "only 10%" doesnt really mean anything if that 10% makes up a greater number of deaths than most other cancers.

you're just all over the place and not making sense. its impossible to follow your arguments because you contradict yourself and say two opposing things in the same post.