Please reread your latest comment and then attribute it to your own fumbling attempts to reply.

You've haven't deconstructed anything while I've now repeatedly taken you to task for shirking the glaring reality of the exploitative material origins of given industrial processes, the ongoing machinations of which remain largely unethical, including but not limited to the example I provided and the idealistic framework that you poorly contrived in protest.

Having the gall to claim that I don't have an argument whilst simultaneously being unable to counter mine or forward one of your own beyond some flimsy nod toward hypothetical, ethical production chains, which, ironically, I did deconstruct through basic contextualization, makes you look dumb. Even as a bad faith ghoul, it should still bother you that your act is so transparent.

It's amusing that you've doubled down by continuing to imply that modes of production aren't functions of the capitalist economic systems under which they operate, but I'd expect nothing less based on our exchange.

You're continuing to deflect from the points that I've made to clearly and succinctly address the material origins and ongoing functioning of production under capitalism as being fundamentally exploitative, and have been, let me reiterate, unwilling solely because you are unable to rebuke this cursory understanding of how capitalism works.

Instead you've projected by squawking about that which you are hilariously guilty of: utter failure to demonstrate any comprehension of the basic terms being discussed or ability present anything bearing any semblance to a counterargument that might reflect your accusation of absurdity. Now you're bowing out with your tail between your legs, as you should.

Please, feel free to return after spending the night fabricating some other bullshit in order to avoid facing your inability to parse others' arguments, let alone produce your own.