Is this your idea of a response vs reaction? You have spewed ugly then a link I have no motivation to see , based on your first snipe, then dogshit rant.
You're going to have to invest more, or just admit you have unaddressed issues with others, that makes fighting with internet strangers easier and more appealing. You know, standard cunt work dogshit nadda.
Now, as to your insight that JP leans conservative, well, anyone rational and calls themselves an adult, would tend towards "conservative". Trouble with that is, actual implimentation of "conservative" values is hard to actually come by, usually cunts in politics bent on getting the poor and uneducated to vote against their own best interests, use "conservative" as a dogshit dogwhistle buzz word to mask their ideology based in fear of the Others.
JP of course from a very rudimentary POV seems to lean conservative, but that's a political polarization based in his recent anti SJW stance and rightly so.
So here we are, kind sir, with you "informing" me of his lean, without a shred of intellectual prowess to explain your curt statement, as if I'm blind to his impact and his merit, leanings, or psychology. You've offered up some dogshit nadda , then went full tilt.
Is there something you, yourself have to offer up, that will convince me or anyone reading this rather distasteful enchanting exchange, your link is worth clicking on? So far , you've illustrated a naive then combative stance that, frankly, is dime a dozen amongst the cunts of Reddit.
I came to this subreddit to endulge curiosity, prompt insight, and get a taste of something more Than Front Page comment angst.
Do you have anything, anything at all contextual to offer, or will you just pronounce JP leans conservative and then profanely pronounce some noise?
Cause I don't suffer fools, cunts, contrarians, nor alt right fuckstick mcretards and so far, you've exemplified all four.
Here's to your response vs reaction, Brother.
We're all One. Well, until the cunts came in sniping instead of contributing.