Honestly you can't win against this argument. Not because AM are in the wrong, but because it's rigged.

For as long as can be remembered AW have rejected AM citing such reasons as they were too nerdy, ugly, sissy, small penis, undateable, unfuckable, etc. But if you pursue traditionally masculine avenues because western society says that as an AM you are less than a man, then you get branded as possessing "toxic masculinity".

So which one is it? I don't think it's the first one because we all know AF love them some gangly Mark Zuckerberg lookalikes who probably go to comic-con every year and are addicted to watching hentai. And AM definitely don't have toxic masculinity because asian cultures, especially East Asian ones are matriarchal. Maybe if they put down Amy Tan for a moment they'd realise that.

Instead of attributing ER and DH to toxic asian masculinity, I posit they are the result of toxic asian femininity. This is what happens when AF who have no dignity or self-respect try to integrate into white society but banked everything on having white children. Hapas are half-white but because of this it means they are not seen or treated as white at all. AF are allowed into the folds of white society because they prevent certain loser white men from permanent inceldom. But of course there is no such demand for AM and consequently anyone which somewhat resembles AM. To make matters worse, they are not only rejected but actively shat upon. No wonder so many hapas try their best to escape being asian and even become unstable. How are the parents and especially the AF in this situation not guilty of parental malpractice?

AF are overprivileged as hell compared to every other non-white demographic in the West. Even then, they still have one of the highest suicide rates for young college aged women in North America (and probably everywhere else).

MUH WHITE ACCEPTANCE