So your argument as a "Sikh" is wrong and my point stays clear. The more I read your questions I could tell you were lost, you fail to accept evidence. Seemingly characteristics of a deluded individual. Read the links man, get an understanding on a bigger picture. Japji Sahib even has answers to your questions give it a read. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

Since you've resorted to personal attacks, i'll come down at your level and address you. Your links are bullshit and full of flaws. You're like a keedi who can't comprehend or imagine anything outside of its world. I think your made up guru is controlling your mind too much .You should get your brain checked, be more open minded and think on your own.

I'm arguing as an agnostic individual and not a Sikh. Have you ever studied philosophy? The question is not why i should accept sikhi. The question is why i should take whatever is written in gurbani at face value? Why should i believe in his leela when there are so many flaws in the argument? Your answer is always "oh its written in gurbani" . If you're going to follow it blindly then call it what it is, it's a rule book! Gurbani cannot be an evidence for itself you dense motherfucker!

Do you believe everything that was written 4-500 years ago? People like you can be manipulated so easily. That's why there are so many deres in punjab. Maybe i should write something too and it'll be believed by people like you 5-600 years later. Go ahead and start screaming main beadbi keeti ah.