Most blunders have been under time pressure though...just on the attacking side...which incentivizes not to attack. That's great that you find it entertaining...but the majority don't find it as entertaining as games with attacking chances have.

We will NEVER get "game of the century" level games when the defender gets 3+ hours to defend at the super gm level. It just won't happen outside of really strange outliers.

I'm fine with the candidates and wcc played with high time controls to show the tip level possible for humans to currently play...but having something in between rapid and candidates time control with a large prize pool will produce some great chess with amazing attacks from the best players in the world.