I appreciate your positivity here. It sounds like you have sincere intentions, so I’ll go ahead and give you a detailed response.

Your recent positive comment is a completely different tune than before. Your previous whole comment was based on your warped assumptions of my intentions and character which you then used as a springboard to derail the narrative to personal gripes you have with Columbia (your extensive use of “we” and “us” painted Columbia as a whole as manipulative, elitist, and secretive too).

So, naturally, it seemed like you were a rando student who needed to blow off some personal steam and chose to twist my post into something you could use as a punching bag. Which is fine, really.