Rebirth in different times, ages and worlds

one pali word can be described in 4 different ways. The total of all these 4 different means together reflect the idea. But now we can see in most of books the explanations given to the Pali is not correctSince the meaning of pali in standard text books have so many distortion, the real meaning is bit far. For an example, "anichcha" in pali is defined as impermanence. Due to the lack of proper understand Anichcha is replaced by anithya. Buddha mainly focused anichcha, not anithya. Translators think the terms both anithya and anichcha are same and those are representing impermanence. It is completely wrong. Anithya (impermanence) has both good and bad effects. But Buddha had combined time and entropy together into anichcha. "Sabbe sankara anichchathi" not sabbe sankar anithyath,It is a common misconception that Buddhists hold time to exist in the human mind. The central doctrine of Buddhism teaches that the nature of reality is essentially cognizant (awake), and hence the title Buddha (awakened one). In the doctrine of emptiness, the Buddha taught that all things (i.e., ideas, objects, activities, etc., that may be perceived or thought about) were not real, but merely contingent. Everything then is like a shadow, arising and persisting as a result of external causes, and so having no innate properties of its own. He taught that there were five elements (space, water, earth, fire, and wind), however, these were not the elements of a substantial reality, but those of a cognizant one. These five elements correspond to the five fundamental concepts that are the foundation of modern physics (space, time, matter, energy, and motion/change). The three latter elements (matter, energy, and motion/change) he taught were mere illusions, while first two (space and time) he taught were neither real nor illusory. By this he meant that neither space nor time can be said to exist independently of the other. In truth, space and time are merely concepts that we use to describe the true elements of this cognizant reality, awareness and knowledge. This is why it is written that it is not what the eye can see that is the true reality, but that whereby the eye is able to see. This is also why the Buddha taught that the true nature of reality was not one, and not two. So you see, in the Buddhist doctrine, nothing exists in the mind of man, for man, like everything else is devoid of any self-abiding properties, including cognizance. Whatever cognizance we may appear to exhibit, is not our own, but merely a reflection of our true nature. Thus we are like the people in a dream, we see, hear, feel, think, and interact, but we have no substance – there is only the eternal dreamer.

/r/Buddhism Thread