Yikes!

Look, I don't want to get caught up in your anger, "It's too early for me to play nice" (You). So, please don't ban me without taking the time to consider what I'm saying. Peace and love, my dude. I hate mornings too.

Albeit, most of what I've said can be traced to religious dogma, what I've said is also apparent fact (common sense). If a commenter says, "Fuck apples, they are evil", and I correct them with, "apples don't have intent", then is that worthy of preaching or correcting ill-minded judgment? To what notions am I forcing on to anyone, other than apparent fact? I'm correcting misguided judgment, not inserting unbacked beliefs and proclaiming scriptural notions in anyway. It's fact that when we die, our ego and body turn to dust, it's fact that humans need community, it's fact hurt people, hurt people, it's fact our ideologies of what a God means are subsets of something that can sustain itself, it's fact religion entails the epicenter of community...this shouldn't be considered "preaching". These are all facts to prove as an argument against what was initially stated.