RISC-V only takes 12 years to achieve the milestone of 10 billion cores, 5 years faster than ARM.

Would you consider adoption rate to be higher just because one dude has a quad CPU workstation versus a regular 1 CPU workstation?

Yes. The metrics should capture not only the instances of usages but also capture how they're being used. Otherwise information on how pervasively deployed something is gets lost and presumably those people

Otherwise you end up in a situation where three tablet computers somehow end up counting as three times more impressive than a jumbo jet even though one of these is orders of magnitude more impressive and use more processors because the job it's doing is more difficult.

You end up with a better idea of what's going on if you adopt a multi-metric approach and just acknowledge that every metric is going to have blindspots like the one you're pointing out.

/r/linux Thread Parent Link - cosfone.com