The only thing they have done is to associate the word "toxic" with "masculinity" , which isn't helpful af all. Sure, they might tall you that they don't mean masculinity is toxic afterwards, but that doesn't really matter even you choose to associate it with "toxic".

There is a reason they didn't term the subset of feminine behaviour as "Toxic femininity", as associating a fundamental aspect of a sex with the word "toxic" isn't helpful at all. They instead choose to actually name the real problems that they felt women had based on gender, instead of giving it a made up term that is vague and unclear.

You're doing exactly what i claimed feminists would do, which is to associate the word "toxic" with "masculinity" in their term, which is "Toxic masculinity", and then subsequently yel at people for associating "toxic" with "masculinity" when hearing that term. I mentioned it in the last comment:

The only thing they have done is to associate the word "toxic" with "masculinity" , which isn't helpful af all. Sure, they might tall you that they don't mean masculinity is toxic afterwards, but that doesn't really matter even you choose to associate it with "toxic".

Try applying the naming scheme "Toxic (Insert anything here)" and see just how horrible it is. Why would feminism also only apply this specific naming scheme for masculinity? It could be applied to all of the female cases as well, but yet they choose to stay away from this kind of naming scheme, where a fundamental aspect of a sex is associated with a derogatory term.