Out of all the responses I've received, yours seems to be the most reasonable thus far. I'm aware of the thesis you suggest. In fact, it has a lot of merit and value in my eyes. But realistically, we live in world full of tradition, value, and meaning. Yes, in an ideological world, we would pick apart and look at things in a light that sees a more sustainable and efficient future, but we are humans and your mindset will always be challenged by the next household. You are entitled to veganism as much as the rich house at the end of the street is entitled to their community BBQ full of rich meats they throw every year. Once you start trying to use imagery like the one OP used to sway people, you start fouling sociology's impact on diets. And sorry, I'm not for that. I mean really. What's the difference between saying "You aren't allowed a certain religion because it causes violence." over "You aren't allowed your traditions because animals are consumed." Because both happen today, and both are completely unreasonable. People wage war over religion, and it's not cut and dry, people have superstitions, and it's not cut and dry, people value trinkets and idols, and it's not cut and dry, & people value the food they consume, and it is not cut and dry. Every sociological, cultural, & traditional aspect that applies to literally everything else humans do on this planet, also apply to food. Just seems kind of weak to attack a small minority of china from a five thousand year old tradition. Go back to attacking big manufacturers of meat in the states. At least then I know the health conditions of my meat to sustain my culture will be improved lol.